Addis Ababa, Ethiopia – (African Boulevard News) – The federal government’s transitional justice model, spearheaded by Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed, is facing renewed criticism as it struggles to make an impact in the Tigray region. Despite ongoing consultations and efforts to address past injustices, many stakeholders argue that the government’s approach falls short in achieving the desired results.
The group of experts commissioned by the federal government recently visited the north of the country to gather insights and recommendations on transitional justice. However, their findings have failed to impress in Tigray, where the wounds of the conflict run deep.
One of the main criticisms leveled against the government’s approach is the lack of inclusivity and meaningful participation of all relevant stakeholders. Critics argue that the top-down nature of the consultations undermines the legitimacy and effectiveness of the transitional justice process. According to them, true reconciliation can only be achieved if the voices of all affected communities, including those in Tigray, are heard and included in the decision-making process.
“The government’s approach to transitional justice in Tigray is inadequate and fails to address the deep-rooted grievances of the people,” says Dr. Hannah Akello, an expert in conflict resolution. “Without genuine and inclusive dialogue, the wounds of the past will continue to fester, hindering the prospects for lasting peace and reconciliation.”
Another point of contention is the slow progress in holding accountable those responsible for the human rights abuses committed during the Tigray conflict. The lack of concrete actions taken against perpetrators has left many victims and their families disillusioned and skeptical of the government’s commitment to justice.
“Transitional justice is only meaningful if it translates into real accountability,” asserts Sarah Gebremichael, a human rights advocate. “The failure to hold those responsible for atrocities accountable undermines the credibility of the government’s overall efforts and perpetuates a culture of impunity.”
Furthermore, the government’s focus on reconciliation without addressing the underlying systemic issues that contributed to the conflict has also drawn criticism. Many argue that unless deep-seated issues such as ethnic tensions, land disputes, and political marginalization are addressed, the prospects for sustainable peace and justice will remain elusive.
As the consultations on transitional justice continue across the country, it is clear that a more inclusive and comprehensive approach is needed. Meaningful participation from all stakeholders, including those in Tigray, is crucial to ensure that the grievances and concerns of the affected communities are adequately addressed.
Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed’s transitional justice model may have failed to impress in Tigray, but there is still an opportunity to rectify the shortcomings and build a more robust and inclusive process. Only through genuine dialogue, accountability, and a comprehensive approach can Ethiopia achieve true reconciliation and lay the foundation for a more peaceful and just society.
